, Apollonius Of RhodesThe Argonautika, And Ovids...

All based on the same myth of Jason and Medea, Euripides Medea, Apollonius of Rhodes the Argonautika, and Ovids Metamorphoses each describe a unique version of the same character. The initial characterization of Medea in Euripides play serves as the basis in which both Apollonius and Ovid base their interpretation of Medea. Although each, in its own defining events, shape a similar Medea who overcomes similar difficulties, the execution of each calls for a different interpretation of the woman by the reader. The organization of each story immensely effects the perspective given to the reader. Euripides play skims over the actual events that take place throughout the story and revolves around the outcome of these events. Leaving†¦show more content†¦Still today, we see many unfaithful marriages, but murder is not an option. A spouse who murders his cheating wife is more wrong than the wife who cheated in the first place, and killing his children to get revenge would be an unspeakable deed. A reader from today cant relate to the thought process of Medea, which lends a slim margin to any sympathy for the character. Euripides, however, does create slight sympathy for her when she mentions her lack of family and friends due to betraying them to be with Jason, who in turn betrays her. This piece of Euripides story, though, is too miniscule to counteract the menacing thoughts of Medea. This same small mention is brought about in Ovids version, but it also is just a brief point without much depth. The Argonautika takes a much more sympathetic route by describing Medea as a much younger, innocent girl. The fact that the second story shows the beginning more in depth leads the reader to see the hardships that may have led her to become the bitter woman Euripides depicts. Neither Euripides nor Ovid include the hateful image of Medeas father, which gives an immediate understanding to the reader as to why Medea can never go back to her homeland. Her betrayal to her father was too great. The readers of the time, knowing the outcome of the story, would have been shown why Medea plotted against Jason the way she did because the hardships she faces to help Jason are explained. Not only was her

Analysis Of `` On Self Respect `` By Joan Didion - 1077 Words

Dear I’ve read a few essays in the past two weeks and learnt a lot. When I put two of those essays together, their different and yet similar ideas have triggered my new concepts about individual and public. And I would love to share that with you. â€Å"We are peculiarly in the thrall to everyone we see, curiously determined to live out -since our self-image is untenable-thief false notions us.†- Joan Didion â€Å"On Self-Respect†.Didion, in his essay, states that to alien from self is to to free us from the expectation of others ,to remain indifferent and to achieve self-respect.Upon reading, I began to wonder if I am self-respect. Character? Free from expectation ?The ability to face up mistakes ? Maybe not.The article written by Joan Didion, I believe, serves as a reminder to the rest of us, reminding us of the relationship between individual and public.Always trying to fit in the imagination of others, people live merely as puppets, controlled by those who te lls you what to do. And this, according to Didion, is the person without self-respect.In the article, Joan Didion mentions the novel The Great Gatsby, which reminds me of another character in this particular novel -Gatsby. Trying to attract Daisy, Gatsby purchased a magnificent mansion in Long Island, where he made himself a name in society by throwing party every weekend to everyone. Unfortunately, his affection for Daisy turns into an insatiable ambition for social status and wealth that leads to his ultimateShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of On Self Respect By Joan Didion1660 Words   |  7 Pagesreality television shows and pop culture. Without realizing the extent to which constructed reality and self-curated life exhibitions shape how we see the world, we form perceptions and establish standards of what our lives should look like based on stories and photos posted on Snapchat and Instagram and find ourselves reflexively belting out song lyrics that directly contradict our values. Joan Didion, a unique and relatable but brilliant author, seems to have an understanding that the challenges sheRead MoreBoyer Dbq Teacher Guide10764 Words   |  44 PagesChange and Family Life, 1815–1860 This DBQ requires that students examine aspects of American home and family life between 1815 and 1860. The structure of the question provides three topics that can be used as a template for structuring the lines of analysis in their essays—westward expansion, the market economy, and early industrialization. A glance at the chronology sections in the textbook that conclude Chapters 9 and 11 should serve to demonstrate that numerous changes occurred relating to each of

The Nativist’s Response to Immigration Free Essays

Immigrants have been seeking salvation or just new opportunities in America for hundreds of years. Even Americans originally started off as immigrants. They came to settle in this New World to seek opportunities. We will write a custom essay sample on The Nativist’s Response to Immigration or any similar topic only for you Order Now These types of immigrants were white, strong, leaders and felt they were superior. In the mid nineteenth century, the â€Å"new† immigrants were also welcomed. According to President Grant, these â€Å"new† immigrants were the weak, broken, and crippled people who had nowhere else to go. Grant thought these â€Å"new† immigrants would ruin the tone of the American life into a more vulgarized tone now that these immigrants are filling up the jails and asylums (Document 4). They mostly came from Southern and Eastern parts of Europe and were poor, ignorant, and illiterate. They were needed for working power and employers liked to use them because they were able to give them cheaper wages. Soon there was an economic boom when machines came to replace the workers. Resentment soon arose since job offers were scarce and immigrants received the jobs over the Americans. Certain groups of Americans opposed open immigration. Many of these people did not want new arrived immigrants to have the right to vote until they have lived in the United States for 21 years. These were often referred to as the Nativist groups. These Nativists were the old type of American immigrants who looked down on these new immigrants and wanted to shield America from them. Nativism did speak out against the Chinese immigration on the West Coast. Nativist arguments say that Chinese immigration would create race antagonism throughout the entire public. This means there will be hostility among the races so there would be separation among the country. In 1882, the Chinese Exclusion Act suspended Chinese immigration for ten years and prohibited the naturalization of the Chinese. The Chinese were once a great asset to America. They came over from China and helped build the railroads. After the railroads were finished, the Chinese were supposed to leave. Instead, they stayed in America for good. The Chinese immigrants now wished to assimilate their own culture and ideas with the American ideas. Americans, mostly Nativists, were extremely bothered by this because the Americans did not want the Chinese to bring their alien culture to America (Document 1). Other groups, who resented other races from assimilating, organized classes so the immigrants can learn the American language and way. They said immigrants should become citizens by learning the â€Å"American language. † They thought if the people that come to America and don’t learn the way of the Americans, then this country will soon be just like the old country, the country which they have already left (Document 3). Resentment over immigration still arose within the United States. Many writers began to blame immigrants for problems regularly occurring throughout time. E. A. Ross wrote that immigrants had a strong influence on American politics and government. He said that the simple minded foreigner is the tap-root to the main issue. The tap-root is the source of the problem. Ross said that once that simple minded foreigner unleashes his ideas, the foreigners get a stronger grip on the situation. They soon broaden and entrench their power by intimidation at the polls; they have ballot frauds, saloon influence, and much more. This will all start from one foreigner and will soon increase till the foreigners have a larger vote (Document 7). Other writers like Rev. Josiah Strong blamed certain â€Å"diseases† on immigrants. These were not actual diseases but more like problems in the country. He blamed immigrants on the lack of holiness in the Sabbath and how it is now a holiday. He also blames the liquor traffic on the immigrants too (Document 2). Whether the immigrants came to America or not, these problems would still be here. It’s human instinct to attack a different race or religion when a problem comes about. That is exactly what the Americans were doing to the immigrants. There was always a large amount of immigrants arriving into the United States. The greatest danger of unrestricted immigration is that the immigrants can overrun the master race and they can have more control then the Americans (Document 5). When a lower race mixes with a higher race in sufficient numbers, history proves that the lower race will prevail. If the Americans continue to let unrestricted amounts of immigrants enter the United States, their thoughts and believes would soon alienate the Americans and the Americans would soon become the strangers in their own country (Document 6). Once Americans began accepting that there is no way to completely stop the flow of immigrants into America, they began to find ways to limit the amount arriving. In 1921 the National Origins Act was put into effect. It looked at the immigration record to find a base year. They looked at the year that the fewest immigrants arrived and called that the base year. They used the base year as the quota for immigrant arrival. Illegal immigration continued and the immigration and Naturalization office spent a good deal of time tracking down and deporting illegal immigrants. Finally the immigration Act of 1985 was passed which said that an illegal immigrant who has been in America for at least five years, and who can prove it, can apply for citizenship and become an American citizen. As long as the flow of immigrants is carefully regulated then immigration should be no problem, maybe even beneficiary. How to cite The Nativist’s Response to Immigration, Essay examples